Tin Goose's Suspension Arms

For the discriminating Tucker enthusiast - obscure facts, questions and answers

Moderators: Tuckerfan1053, TuckerCar, Phantomrig

Forum rules
The views expressed by users of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the Tucker Automobile Club of America, Inc., its members, officers or directors. Each user is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.

By utilizing these boards you are agreeing to these terms and agree to hold harmless Tucker Automobile Club of America, Inc. and its members, officers or directors from any part in the outcome of your use of these boards.

The Tucker Automobile Club of America, Inc. reserves the right to delete, edit or otherwise modify posts as it deems necessary for the organization or primary purpose of the site. Please report any activity which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the forum administrator immediately.

Tin Goose's Suspension Arms

Postby Tuckerfan1053 » Fri Jun 25, 2010 12:41 pm

I'm in the midst of rereading The Indomitable Tin Goose, when I stumbled across mention of them having to make replacement suspension arms for the Tin Goose out of beryllium copper. I find this a bit difficult to believe as the material was (and is) rather uncommon. Its also highly difficult to machine (even moreso back before the invention of ceramic cutters). Anybody know if this is correct? (It'd be easy to tell if they are, since unpainted they'd look like they were made of copper, they'd also be incredibly hard and wouldn't spark if hit by a hammer.)

If they were beryllium copper, then its a wonder where Tucker's boys would have gotten the material, since what was available was rather tightly controlled as part of wartime production (It had a number of military uses). Its possible that the stuff was left over from the turrets Tucker built (though I could find no mention of the material being used in the patents) or from the failed airplane attempt.
User avatar
Tuckerfan1053
Moderator
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Gallatin, TN

Re: Tin Goose's Suspension Arms

Postby cicero » Fri Jun 25, 2010 2:22 pm

Perhaps there was some laying around the factory left over from the wartime production that took place in that factory?
cicero
Tucker Fan
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:44 pm

Re: Tin Goose's Suspension Arms

Postby Tuckerfan1053 » Sat Jun 26, 2010 3:15 am

cicero wrote:Perhaps there was some laying around the factory left over from the wartime production that took place in that factory?

Possibly, but highly unlikely, IMHO. The price of beryllium copper would have been pretty close to that of gold, and I can't imagine it being "just left" there, since amongst its uses in non-sparking tooling and electronics, it was necessary for making nuclear weapons. Then there's the timeline of when the arms were made and when the duplicates in becu would have been made. Given the nutty nature of Tucker being allowed in the plant, then kicked out of the plant, then allowed back in again, I can't imagine that they'd have time to rummage around and find the stuff (and realize what it was and what its properties were) and get the parts made in time to slap them into the Tin Goose after the aluminum ones broke.
User avatar
Tuckerfan1053
Moderator
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Gallatin, TN

Re: Tin Goose's Suspension Arms

Postby Randy Earle » Sat Jun 26, 2010 1:20 pm

I can't understand why they would use a metal like that instead of chrome steel or titanium.
Randy Earle
 

Re: Tin Goose's Suspension Arms

Postby Tuckerfan1053 » Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:15 am

Randy Earle wrote:I can't understand why they would use a metal like that instead of chrome steel or titanium.

Titanium didn't really start to see any use until the 50s, so its doubtful if they'd have had access to it. Chrome steel makes some sense, so that's a distinct possibility.

The story goes, as we all know, that Tucker wanted the Tin Goose's suspension arms made out of aluminum to save weight and that Eddie or one of the other boys knew that because of how much lead there was in the body, aluminum couldn't handle it, and since Preston wouldn't listen to Eddie's objections, he secretly made a stronger set (which Pearson says was beryllium copper), so that he could swap them out the instant the first set failed.

Its possible that the ring for the turrets was made of beryllium copper (since it would have been incredibly tough), and that might be where Eddie (or whomever) got it. Methinks a trip to some aviation related message boards is in order.
User avatar
Tuckerfan1053
Moderator
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Gallatin, TN

Re: Tin Goose's Suspension Arms

Postby bill/k4flh » Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:32 pm

I have an idea where the beryllium may have come from. Joe Lencki or my dad. Joe and dad worked with Enrico Fermi at Stagg Field on the atomic pile. I imagine there may have been some surplus there because beryllium was used in the pile. Just an idea!
73
Bill/K4FLH
Curmudgeon at large
Illegitimis non carborundum
bill/k4flh
Newbie
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:05 pm
Location: Lake Chickamauga TN (Chattanooga)

Re: Tin Goose's Suspension Arms

Postby Tuckeroo » Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:37 am

So what's on the Tin Goose today?
Tuckeroo
TACA Member
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:57 pm

Re: Tin Goose's Suspension Arms

Postby John K. » Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:59 pm

That's just what I was wondering! Good question. Go to the actual car, get under it and find out. Do a little primary research.
John K.
TACA Member
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:17 pm


Return to Tucker History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron