by Prototype » Thu Feb 04, 2010 6:24 pm
In my opinion, Regardless of the fact that the car was modified with either a new chassis and a front engine/rear drive layout or the original chassis was retained and modfied itself, does say something about the timeless and innovative design of the body. It is still a Tucker despite the drivetrain swap. Now that it is being restored to it's original glory, it will join the rest of it's bretherin as a signifigant artifact in automotive history, in that almost 94% of the original fleet produced are accounted for. Few, if any Manufacturers, can boast such a survival rate for any of its models, no matter how rare or historical signifigance it may have. Even though they are fabricating a chassis for 1046 to restore it back to original specs, I don't think it will hurt it's value since it is not being "purported" as anything other than a restoration. I can't wait to see it finished and on display in its original intended configuration. Perhaps finding one of those mysterious test chassis' (how many are actually out there?) would be more well suited under 1046 or even in a museum, rather than being hacked up or (gasp) modified for a topless wonder that has had more surgery and is surrounded by more controversy than Pam Anderson. I have said all that, to say this, Let's keep the Preston Tucker, Et al... Legacy alive for many generations to come. My son is almost Three and he knows what a Tucker is and can point out Preston and Alex's photo as well many other innovations about the car. Man am I proud!!!!!
If you didn't get dirty, then nothing was accomplished!