Mechanix Illustrated tests the 1950 Studebaker

Discuss Anything & Everything Tucker

Moderators: Tuckerfan1053, TuckerCar, Phantomrig

Forum rules
The views expressed by users of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the Tucker Automobile Club of America, Inc., its members, officers or directors. Each user is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.

By utilizing these boards you are agreeing to these terms and agree to hold harmless Tucker Automobile Club of America, Inc. and its members, officers or directors from any part in the outcome of your use of these boards.

The Tucker Automobile Club of America, Inc. reserves the right to delete, edit or otherwise modify posts as it deems necessary for the organization or primary purpose of the site. Please report any activity which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the forum administrator immediately.

Mechanix Illustrated tests the 1950 Studebaker

Postby Tuckeroo » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:52 pm

This test includes one of my favorite quotes from the inimitable Tom McCahill:

To this writer, however, it looks like the Studebaker people did a bit of borrowing themselves for a change. Most of us knew it would be just a matter of months before the Tucker “turkey” was laid on the Thanksgiving table for carving. Well, it appears as how Studebaker has started the dissection rolling by slicing off the Tucker nose as their helping. When I was first asked by a Studebaker executive what I thought of the new car I told him, “Though it’s not exact, the front looks as though Tucker must have passed through South Bend on a bicycle.” He quickly pointed out that I was wrong and said he could prove how it varied. But I’ll stick to my guns and say again that, to my eyes anyway, it looks like the turkey is on the table.

Rest of the article:

http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/06/19/mi-tests-the-1950-studebaker/#more-7885
Tuckeroo
TACA Member
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:57 pm

Re: Mechanix Illustrated tests the 1950 Studebaker

Postby Randy Earle » Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:30 pm

I always liked Tom McCahill, in my opinion he was the best automotive jounalist that ever lived. Gray Baskerville comes in a close second.
Randy Earle
 

Re: Mechanix Illustrated tests the 1950 Studebaker

Postby NailheadRocketman » Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:46 am

Automobile magazine just did a review of the 1950-51 Studebakers and the reviews weren't much different than what Tom McCahill said about the car all the way back then, except the author of the article complained about these cars not having power steering and how parking a Studebaker was a "chore". These Studebakers are great cars, even if slower than watching paint dry. The V8 Commanders and Land Cruisers are a little more gutsy. In MN, we mainly have the Champion and Commander versions of these cars, Land Cruisers that haven't been cut up for street rods are rare in these parts. Craigslist recently was full of bullet nose Studes including one 1950 Commander with a v8. I've also seen a couple 1951 Champions with automatics in them around here, but no Starlight coupes other than a non-bullet nose 1947 model which was all beat up(that's okay though, you can't tell if a Starlight is coming or going). 52' Studes are great cars as well, they are identical to the 1950-51 models past the firewall, but have an odd "clam digger" front clip with turn signals under the headlights. The high amount of these cars still out there in either fair or near drivable condition is a testament to them being great vehicles. if anyone out there has a chance to buy one, please take it! it may be as close to owning a Tucker as you're ever going to get. Anyway, here is the URL to the Automobile magazine article:

http://www.automobilemag.com/features/c ... index.html
NailheadRocketman
Tuckerette
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:52 am


Return to Tucker Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron