by Paul » Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:49 pm
Oh, they've heard of Tucker having that headlight alright. Remember, Lexus is owned by Toyota, who has private ownership of a Tucker car. GM also ripped off Tucker with thier outrageous Precept car (three headlights and rear engined)which will probably never be brought out. It looks like a Tucker that is built for the 21st century. Other auto companies also ripped off Tucker in other ways. Streamlining, fuel injection, a padded dash, pop-out windshields, they all were so-called trademarks of GM and Kaiser-Willys. Studebaker profited in the past from Tucker's downfall, as they had may Tucker styling cues(except they were slower than turtles). Chrysler even had an idea to build thier own version of the Tucker with front wheel drive. Keep watching ths automotive industry in the next few years. You will see more large, streamlined autos with retro ques, all inspired by either Tuckers or some other car. New efficient engines, CVTs (which were Tucker's original idea with the 589 car), will give way to more well-balanced machines with either mid-engine or rear engine setups. This will mean a roomier compartment for passengers, and better crash protection. Cars are already starting to get bigger, just look at the Chrysler 300c, or Infiniti's monster muscle cars which are supposedly more efficient than ours, which I highly doubt. Many manufacturers took what they needed from Tucker and never gave anything back. The Japanese had little tin cans for cars when they were first sold in the U.S., now all of a sudden they're producing high-end luxury cars that no one can afford except high ranking businessmen. How is that better? The Tucker was advanced and luxury enough and it was totally blackballed from the auto world for nothing. But that's what happens when you have an idea that everyone likes and no one else has.<br>
<br>
Paul
<p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p206.ezboard.com/btucker.showUserPublicProfile?gid=paul@tucker>Paul</A> at: 1/4/05 12:51 am<br></i>